Tight Bounds for Answering Adaptively Chosen Concentrated Queries

Emma Rapoport, Edith Cohen, Uri Stemmer
7/18/2025
cs.DScs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Most work on adaptive data analysis assumes that samples in the dataset are independent. When correlations are allowed, even the non-adaptive setting can become intractable, unless some structural constraints are imposed. To address this, Bassily and Freund [2016] introduced the elegant framework of concentrated queries, which requires the analyst to restrict itself to queries that are concentrated around their expected value. While this assumption makes the problem trivial in the non-adaptive setting, in the adaptive setting it remains quite challenging. In fact, all known algorithms in this framework support significantly fewer queries than in the independent case: At most $O(n)$ queries for a sample of size $n$, compared to $O(n^2)$ in the independent setting. In this work, we prove that this utility gap is inherent under the current formulation of the concentrated queries framework, assuming some natural conditions on the algorithm. Additionally, we present a simplified version of the best-known algorithms that match our impossibility result.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rapoport2025tight,
  title  = {Tight Bounds for Answering Adaptively Chosen Concentrated Queries},
  author = {Emma Rapoport and Edith Cohen and Uri Stemmer},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.13700},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13700v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.13700.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.13700)

Discussion