Compatibility of Max and Sum Objectives for Committee Selection and k-Facility Location

Yue Han, Elliot Anshelevich
7/22/2025
cs.DScs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study a version of the metric facility location problem (or, equivalently, variants of the committee selection problem) in which we must choose $k$ facilities in an arbitrary metric space to serve some set of clients $C$. We consider four different objectives, where each client $i\in C$ attempts to minimize either the sum or the maximum of its distance to the chosen facilities, and where the overall objective either considers the sum or the maximum of the individual client costs. Rather than optimizing a single objective at a time, we study how compatible these objectives are with each other, and show the existence of solutions which are simultaneously close-to-optimum for any pair of the above objectives. Our results show that when choosing a set of facilities or a representative committee, it is often possible to form a solution which is good for several objectives at the same time, instead of sacrificing one desideratum to achieve another.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{han2025compatibility,
  title  = {Compatibility of Max and Sum Objectives for Committee Selection and k-Facility Location},
  author = {Yue Han and Elliot Anshelevich},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.17063},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17063v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.17063.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.17063)

Discussion