Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

Amrith Setlur, Pratiksha Thaker, Jonathan Ullman
7/23/2025
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The most effective differentially private machine learning algorithms in practice rely on an additional source of purportedly public data. This paradigm is most interesting when the two sources combine to be more than the sum of their parts. However, there are settings such as mean estimation where we have strong lower bounds, showing that when the two data sources have the same distribution, there is no complementary value to combining the two data sources. In this work we extend the known lower bounds for public-private learning to setting where the two data sources exhibit significant distribution shift. Our results apply to both Gaussian mean estimation where the two distributions have different means, and to Gaussian linear regression where the two distributions exhibit parameter shift. We find that when the shift is small (relative to the desired accuracy), either public or private data must be sufficiently abundant to estimate the private parameter. Conversely, when the shift is large, public data provides no benefit.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{setlur2025lower,
  title  = {Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift},
  author = {Amrith Setlur and Pratiksha Thaker and Jonathan Ullman},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.17895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17895v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.17895.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.17895)

Discussion