Modeling Uncertainty: Constraint-Based Belief States in Imperfect-Information Games

Achille Morenville, Éric Piette
7/25/2025
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In imperfect-information games, agents must make decisions based on partial knowledge of the game state. The Belief Stochastic Game model addresses this challenge by delegating state estimation to the game model itself. This allows agents to operate on externally provided belief states, thereby reducing the need for game-specific inference logic. This paper investigates two approaches to represent beliefs in games with hidden piece identities: a constraint-based model using Constraint Satisfaction Problems and a probabilistic extension using Belief Propagation to estimate marginal probabilities. We evaluated the impact of both representations using general-purpose agents across two different games. Our findings indicate that constraint-based beliefs yield results comparable to those of probabilistic inference, with minimal differences in agent performance. This suggests that constraint-based belief states alone may suffice for effective decision-making in many settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{morenville2025modeling,
  title  = {Modeling Uncertainty: Constraint-Based Belief States in Imperfect-Information Games},
  author = {Achille Morenville and Éric Piette},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.19263},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19263v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.19263.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.19263)

Discussion