Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?

Vincent C. Müller
6/16/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Floridi and Taddeo propose a condition of "zero semantic commitment" for solutions to the grounding problem, and a solution to it. I argue briefly that their condition cannot be fulfilled, not even by their own solution. After a look at Luc Steels' very different competing suggestion, I suggest that we need to re-think what the problem is and what role the 'goals' in a system play in formulating the problem. On the basis of a proper understanding of computing, I come to the conclusion that the only sensible grounding problem is how we can explain and re-produce the behavioral ability and function of meaning in artificial computational agents

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2025which,
  title  = {Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?},
  author = {Vincent C. Müller},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.21080},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21080v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.21080.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.21080)

Discussion