Evaluating and Improving the Robustness of Speech Command Recognition Models to Noise and Distribution Shifts

Anaïs Baranger, Lucas Maison
7/30/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Although prior work in computer vision has shown strong correlations between in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) accuracies, such relationships remain underexplored in audio-based models. In this study, we investigate how training conditions and input features affect the robustness and generalization abilities of spoken keyword classifiers under OOD conditions. We benchmark several neural architectures across a variety of evaluation sets. To quantify the impact of noise on generalization, we make use of two metrics: Fairness (F), which measures overall accuracy gains compared to a baseline model, and Robustness (R), which assesses the convergence between ID and OOD performance. Our results suggest that noise-aware training improves robustness in some configurations. These findings shed new light on the benefits and limitations of noise-based augmentation for generalization in speech models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{baranger2025evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating and Improving the Robustness of Speech Command Recognition Models to Noise and Distribution Shifts},
  author = {Anaïs Baranger and Lucas Maison},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.23128},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23128v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.23128.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.23128)

Discussion