What's Taboo for You? - An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs Behavior Toward Sensitive Content

Alfio Ferrara, Sergio Picascia, Laura Pinnavaia, Vojimir Ranitovic, Elisabetta Rocchetti +1 more
7/31/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown tendencies toward politeness, formality, and implicit content moderation. While previous research has primarily focused on explicitly training models to moderate and detoxify sensitive content, there has been limited exploration of whether LLMs implicitly sanitize language without explicit instructions. This study empirically analyzes the implicit moderation behavior of GPT-4o-mini when paraphrasing sensitive content and evaluates the extent of sensitivity shifts. Our experiments indicate that GPT-4o-mini systematically moderates content toward less sensitive classes, with substantial reductions in derogatory and taboo language. Also, we evaluate the zero-shot capabilities of LLMs in classifying sentence sensitivity, comparing their performances against traditional methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{ferrara2025whats,
  title  = {What's Taboo for You? - An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs Behavior Toward Sensitive Content},
  author = {Alfio Ferrara and Sergio Picascia and Laura Pinnavaia and Vojimir Ranitovic and Elisabetta Rocchetti and Alice Tuveri},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.23319},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23319v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.23319.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.23319)

Discussion