Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine

Samuele Grossi, Marco Letizia, Riccardo Torre
8/4/2025
stat.MLcs.LGhep-ex

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The rise of generative models for scientific research calls for the development of new methods to evaluate their fidelity. A natural framework for addressing this problem is two-sample hypothesis testing, namely the task of determining whether two data sets are drawn from the same distribution. In large-scale and high-dimensional regimes, machine learning offers a set of tools to push beyond the limitations of standard statistical techniques. In this work, we put this claim to the test by comparing a recent proposal from the high-energy physics literature, the New Physics Learning Machine, to perform a classification-based two-sample test against a number of alternative approaches, following the framework presented in Grossi et al. (2025). We highlight the efficiency tradeoffs of the method and the computational costs that come from adopting learning-based approaches. Finally, we discuss the advantages of the different methods for different use cases.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{grossi2025comparing,
  title  = {Comparing Generative Models with the New Physics Learning Machine},
  author = {Samuele Grossi and Marco Letizia and Riccardo Torre},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.02275},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02275v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.02275.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.02275)

Discussion