Difficulty-Based Preference Data Selection by DPO Implicit Reward Gap

Xuan Qi, Rongwu Xu, Zhijing Jin
8/6/2025
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is a critical challenge in AI research. While methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) are widely used, they often rely on large, costly preference datasets. The current work lacks methods for high-quality data selection specifically for preference data. In this work, we introduce a novel difficulty-based data selection strategy for preference datasets, grounded in the DPO implicit reward mechanism. By selecting preference data examples with smaller DPO implicit reward gaps, which are indicative of more challenging cases, we improve data efficiency and model alignment. Our approach consistently outperforms five strong baselines across multiple datasets and alignment tasks, achieving superior performance with only 10\% of the original data. This principled, efficient selection method offers a promising solution for scaling LLM alignment with limited resources.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{qi2025difficultybased,
  title  = {Difficulty-Based Preference Data Selection by DPO Implicit Reward Gap},
  author = {Xuan Qi and Rongwu Xu and Zhijing Jin},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.04149},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04149v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.04149.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.04149)

Discussion