Near Optimal Inference for the Best-Performing Algorithm

Amichai Painsky
8/7/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Consider a collection of competing machine learning algorithms. Given their performance on a benchmark of datasets, we would like to identify the best performing algorithm. Specifically, which algorithm is most likely to rank highest on a future, unseen dataset. A natural approach is to select the algorithm that demonstrates the best performance on the benchmark. However, in many cases the performance differences are marginal and additional candidates may also be considered. This problem is formulated as subset selection for multinomial distributions. Formally, given a sample from a countable alphabet, our goal is to identify a minimal subset of symbols that includes the most frequent symbol in the population with high confidence. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for the subset selection problem. We provide both asymptotic and finite-sample schemes that significantly improve upon currently known methods. In addition, we provide matching lower bounds, demonstrating the favorable performance of our proposed schemes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{painsky2025near,
  title  = {Near Optimal Inference for the Best-Performing Algorithm},
  author = {Amichai Painsky},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.05173},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05173v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.05173.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.05173)

Discussion