Reduction Techniques for Survival Analysis

Johannes Piller, Léa Orsini, Simon Wiegrebe, John Zobolas, Lukas Burk +4 more
8/7/2025
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this work, we discuss what we refer to as reduction techniques for survival analysis, that is, techniques that "reduce" a survival task to a more common regression or classification task, without ignoring the specifics of survival data. Such techniques particularly facilitate machine learning-based survival analysis, as they allow for applying standard tools from machine and deep learning to many survival tasks without requiring custom learners. We provide an overview of different reduction techniques and discuss their respective strengths and weaknesses. We also provide a principled implementation of some of these reductions, such that they are directly available within standard machine learning workflows. We illustrate each reduction using dedicated examples and perform a benchmark analysis that compares their predictive performance to established machine learning methods for survival analysis.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{piller2025reduction,
  title  = {Reduction Techniques for Survival Analysis},
  author = {Johannes Piller and Léa Orsini and Simon Wiegrebe and John Zobolas and Lukas Burk and Sophie Hanna Langbein and Philip Studener and Markus Goeswein and Andreas Bender},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.05715},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05715v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.05715.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.05715)

Discussion