Prospect Theory Fails for LLMs: Revealing Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty

Rui Wang, Qihan Lin, Jiayu Liu, Qing Zong, Tianshi Zheng +2 more
8/12/2025
cs.AI

Official code: HKUST-KnowComp/MarPT (4 stars, last commit 2026-03-24).

Abstract

Prospect Theory (PT) models human decision-making under uncertainty, while epistemic markers (e.g., maybe) serve to express uncertainty in language. However, it remains largely unexplored whether Prospect Theory applies to contemporary Large Language Models and whether epistemic markers, which express human uncertainty, affect their decision-making behaviour. To address these research gaps, we design a three-stage experiment based on economic questionnaires. We propose a more general and precise evaluation framework to model LLMs' decision-making behaviour under PT, introducing uncertainty through the empirical probability values associated with commonly used epistemic markers in comparable contexts. We then incorporate epistemic markers into the evaluation framework based on their corresponding probability values to examine their influence on LLM decision-making behaviours. Our findings suggest that modelling LLMs' decision-making with PT is not consistently reliable, particularly when uncertainty is expressed in diverse linguistic forms. Our code is released in https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MarPT.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Code for Prospect Theory Fails for LLMs: Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty

40Shell, PythonAug 11, 20257 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2025prospect,
  title  = {Prospect Theory Fails for LLMs: Revealing Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty},
  author = {Rui Wang and Qihan Lin and Jiayu Liu and Qing Zong and Tianshi Zheng and Weiqi Wang and Yangqiu Song},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.08992},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08992v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.08992.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.08992)

Discussion