Constrained Black-Box Attacks Against Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Amine Andam, Jamal Bentahar, Mustapha Hedabou
8/12/2025
cs.LGcs.MA

No official code found. Best implementation: AmineAndam04/black-box-marl (3 stars, last commit 2025-08-11).

Abstract

Collaborative multi-agent reinforcement learning (c-MARL) has rapidly evolved, offering state-of-the-art algorithms for real-world applications, including sensitive domains. However, a key challenge to its widespread adoption is the lack of a thorough investigation into its vulnerabilities to adversarial attacks. Existing work predominantly focuses on training-time attacks or unrealistic scenarios, such as access to policy weights or the ability to train surrogate policies. In this paper, we investigate new vulnerabilities under more realistic and constrained conditions, assuming an adversary can only collect and perturb the observations of deployed agents. We also consider scenarios where the adversary has no access at all. We propose simple yet highly effective algorithms for generating adversarial perturbations designed to misalign how victim agents perceive their environment. Our approach is empirically validated on three benchmarks and 22 environments, demonstrating its effectiveness across diverse algorithms and environments. Furthermore, we show that our algorithm is sample-efficient, requiring only 1,000 samples compared to the millions needed by previous methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Constrained Black-Box Attacks Against Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

30PythonAug 11, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{andam2025constrained,
  title  = {Constrained Black-Box Attacks Against Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Amine Andam and Jamal Bentahar and Mustapha Hedabou},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.09275},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09275v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.09275.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.09275)

Discussion