How Causal Abstraction Underpins Computational Explanation

Atticus Geiger, Jacqueline Harding, Thomas Icard
8/15/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Explanations of cognitive behavior often appeal to computations over representations. What does it take for a system to implement a given computation over suitable representational vehicles within that system? We argue that the language of causality -- and specifically the theory of causal abstraction -- provides a fruitful lens on this topic. Drawing on current discussions in deep learning with artificial neural networks, we illustrate how classical themes in the philosophy of computation and cognition resurface in contemporary machine learning. We offer an account of computational implementation grounded in causal abstraction, and examine the role for representation in the resulting picture. We argue that these issues are most profitably explored in connection with generalization and prediction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{geiger2025causal,
  title  = {How Causal Abstraction Underpins Computational Explanation},
  author = {Atticus Geiger and Jacqueline Harding and Thomas Icard},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.11214},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11214v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.11214.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.11214)

Discussion