Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion

Vincent C. Müller, Nick Bostrom
8/9/2025
cs.CYcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

There is, in some quarters, concern about high-level machine intelligence and superintelligent AI coming up in a few decades, bringing with it significant risks for humanity. In other quarters, these issues are ignored or considered science fiction. We wanted to clarify what the distribution of opinions actually is, what probability the best experts currently assign to high-level machine intelligence coming up within a particular time-frame, which risks they see with that development, and how fast they see these developing. We thus designed a brief questionnaire and distributed it to four groups of experts in 2012/2013. The median estimate of respondents was for a one in two chance that high-level machine intelligence will be developed around 2040-2050, rising to a nine in ten chance by 2075. Experts expect that systems will move on to superintelligence in less than 30 years thereafter. They estimate the chance is about one in three that this development turns out to be 'bad' or 'extremely bad' for humanity.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2025future,
  title  = {Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion},
  author = {Vincent C. Müller and Nick Bostrom},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.11681},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11681v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.11681.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.11681)

Discussion