Generalisation and benign over-fitting for linear regression onto random functional covariates

Andrew Jones, Nick Whiteley
8/19/2025
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We study theoretical predictive performance of ridge and ridge-less least-squares regression when covariate vectors arise from evaluating $p$ random, means-square continuous functions over a latent metric space at $n$ random and unobserved locations, subject to additive noise. This leads us away from the standard assumption of i.i.d. data to a setting in which the $n$ covariate vectors are exchangeable but not independent in general. Under an assumption of independence across dimensions, $4$-th order moment, and other regularity conditions, we obtain probabilistic bounds on a notion of predictive excess risk adapted to our random functional covariate setting, making use of recent results of Barzilai and Shamir. We derive convergence rates in regimes where $p$ grows suitably fast relative to $n$, illustrating interplay between ingredients of the model in determining convergence behaviour and the role of additive covariate noise in benign-overfitting.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{jones2025generalisation,
  title  = {Generalisation and benign over-fitting for linear regression onto random functional covariates},
  author = {Andrew Jones and Nick Whiteley},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.13895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13895v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.13895.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.13895)

Discussion