CEQuest: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Construction Estimation

Yanzhao Wu, Lufan Wang, Rui Liu
8/22/2025
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of general-domain tasks. However, their effectiveness in specialized fields, such as construction, remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce CEQuest, a novel benchmark dataset specifically designed to evaluate the performance of LLMs in answering construction-related questions, particularly in the areas of construction drawing interpretation and estimation. We conduct comprehensive experiments using five state-of-the-art LLMs, including Gemma 3, Phi4, LLaVA, Llama 3.3, and GPT-4.1, and evaluate their performance in terms of accuracy, execution time, and model size. Our experimental results demonstrate that current LLMs exhibit considerable room for improvement, highlighting the importance of integrating domain-specific knowledge into these models. To facilitate further research, we will open-source the proposed CEQuest dataset, aiming to foster the development of specialized large language models (LLMs) tailored to the construction domain.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2025cequest,
  title  = {CEQuest: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Construction Estimation},
  author = {Yanzhao Wu and Lufan Wang and Rui Liu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.16081},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16081v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.16081.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.16081)

Discussion