OMHBench: Benchmarking Balanced and Grounded Omni-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning

Seunghee Kim, Ingyu Bang, Seokgyu Jang, Changhyeon Kim, Sanghwan Bae +3 more
8/22/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have increasingly supported omni-modal processing across text, vision, and speech. However, existing evaluation frameworks for such models suffer from critical limitations, including modality shortcuts and biased reasoning paths. To address these challenges, we propose OMHBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate omni-modal multi-hop reasoning. It consists of 6,144 questions with balanced reasoning paths that are jointly grounded across all three modalities. Extensive evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art models reveals that (1) a large performance gap exists between proprietary and open-source MLLMs and (2) even proprietary models exhibit high sensitivity to reasoning path variations, resulting in asymmetric omni-modal grounding. Notably, models struggle when processing the speech modality, underscoring the need for balanced, multi-hop evaluation of omni-modal intelligence.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kim2025omhbench,
  title  = {OMHBench: Benchmarking Balanced and Grounded Omni-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning},
  author = {Seunghee Kim and Ingyu Bang and Seokgyu Jang and Changhyeon Kim and Sanghwan Bae and Jihun Choi and Richeng Xuan and Taeuk Kim},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.16198},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16198v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.16198.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.16198)

Discussion