Post Hoc Regression Refinement via Pairwise Rankings

Kevin Tirta Wijaya, Michael Sun, Minghao Guo, Hans-Peter Seidel, Wojciech Matusik +1 more
8/22/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of continuous properties is essential to many scientific and engineering tasks. Although deep-learning regressors excel with abundant labels, their accuracy deteriorates in data-scarce regimes. We introduce RankRefine, a model-agnostic, plug-and-play post hoc method that refines regression with expert knowledge coming from pairwise rankings. Given a query item and a small reference set with known properties, RankRefine combines the base regressor's output with a rank-based estimate via inverse variance weighting, requiring no retraining. In molecular property prediction task, RankRefine achieves up to 10% relative reduction in mean absolute error using only 20 pairwise comparisons obtained through a general-purpose large language model (LLM) with no finetuning. As rankings provided by human experts or general-purpose LLMs are sufficient for improving regression across diverse domains, RankRefine offers practicality and broad applicability, especially in low-data settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wijaya2025post,
  title  = {Post Hoc Regression Refinement via Pairwise Rankings},
  author = {Kevin Tirta Wijaya and Michael Sun and Minghao Guo and Hans-Peter Seidel and Wojciech Matusik and Vahid Babaei},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.16495},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16495v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.16495.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.16495)

Discussion