Assessing Consciousness-Related Behaviors in Large Language Models Using the Maze Test

Rui A. Pimenta, Tim Schlippe, Kristina Schaaff
8/22/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We investigate consciousness-like behaviors in Large Language Models (LLMs) using the Maze Test, challenging models to navigate mazes from a first-person perspective. This test simultaneously probes spatial awareness, perspective-taking, goal-directed behavior, and temporal sequencing-key consciousness-associated characteristics. After synthesizing consciousness theories into 13 essential characteristics, we evaluated 12 leading LLMs across zero-shot, one-shot, and few-shot learning scenarios. Results showed reasoning-capable LLMs consistently outperforming standard versions, with Gemini 2.0 Pro achieving 52.9% Complete Path Accuracy and DeepSeek-R1 reaching 80.5% Partial Path Accuracy. The gap between these metrics indicates LLMs struggle to maintain coherent self-models throughout solutions -- a fundamental consciousness aspect. While LLMs show progress in consciousness-related behaviors through reasoning mechanisms, they lack the integrated, persistent self-awareness characteristic of consciousness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{pimenta2025assessing,
  title  = {Assessing Consciousness-Related Behaviors in Large Language Models Using the Maze Test},
  author = {Rui A. Pimenta and Tim Schlippe and Kristina Schaaff},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.16705},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16705v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.16705.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.16705)

Discussion