Proximal Supervised Fine-Tuning

Wenhong Zhu, Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Xingwu Sun, Di Wang +1 more
8/25/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of foundation models often leads to poor generalization, where prior capabilities deteriorate after tuning on new tasks or domains. Inspired by trust-region policy optimization (TRPO) and proximal policy optimization (PPO) in reinforcement learning (RL), we propose Proximal SFT (PSFT). This fine-tuning objective incorporates the benefits of trust-region, effectively constraining policy drift during SFT while maintaining competitive tuning. By viewing SFT as a special case of policy gradient methods with constant positive advantages, we derive PSFT that stabilizes optimization and leads to generalization, while leaving room for further optimization in subsequent post-training stages. Experiments across mathematical and human-value domains show that PSFT matches SFT in-domain, outperforms it in out-of-domain generalization, remains stable under prolonged training without causing entropy collapse, and provides a stronger foundation for the subsequent optimization.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhu2025proximal,
  title  = {Proximal Supervised Fine-Tuning},
  author = {Wenhong Zhu and Ruobing Xie and Rui Wang and Xingwu Sun and Di Wang and Pengfei Liu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.17784},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17784v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.17784.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.17784)

Discussion