Quantum Entanglement as Super-Confounding: From Bell's Theorem to Robust Machine Learning

Pilsung Kang
8/26/2025
quant-phcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Bell's theorem reveals a profound conflict between quantum mechanics and local realism, a conflict we reinterpret through the modern lens of causal inference. We propose and computationally validate a framework where quantum entanglement acts as a "super-confounding" resource, generating correlations that violate the classical causal bounds set by Bell's inequalities. This work makes three key contributions: First, we establish a physical hierarchy of confounding (Quantum > Classical) and introduce Confounding Strength (CS) to quantify this effect. Second, we provide a circuit-based implementation of the quantum $\mathcal{DO}$-calculus to distinguish causality from spurious correlation. Finally, we apply this calculus to a quantum machine learning problem, where causal feature selection yields a statistically significant 11.3% average absolute improvement in model robustness. Our framework bridges quantum foundations and causal AI, offering a new, practical perspective on quantum correlations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kang2025quantum,
  title  = {Quantum Entanglement as Super-Confounding: From Bell's Theorem to Robust Machine Learning},
  author = {Pilsung Kang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.19327},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19327v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.19327.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.19327)

Discussion