Analysing Chain of Thought Dynamics: Active Guidance or Unfaithful Post-hoc Rationalisation?

Samuel Lewis-Lim, Xingwei Tan, Zhixue Zhao, Nikolaos Aletras
8/27/2025
cs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) often yields limited gains for soft-reasoning problems such as analytical and commonsense reasoning. CoT can also be unfaithful to a model's actual reasoning. We investigate the dynamics and faithfulness of CoT in soft-reasoning tasks across instruction-tuned, reasoning and reasoning-distilled models. Our findings reveal differences in how these models rely on CoT, and show that CoT influence and faithfulness are not always aligned.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lewislim2025analysing,
  title  = {Analysing Chain of Thought Dynamics: Active Guidance or Unfaithful Post-hoc Rationalisation?},
  author = {Samuel Lewis-Lim and Xingwei Tan and Zhixue Zhao and Nikolaos Aletras},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2508.19827},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19827v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2508.19827.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2508.19827)

Discussion