Pilot Study on Generative AI and Critical Thinking in Higher Education Classrooms

W. F. Lamberti, S. R. Lawrence, D. White, S. Kim, S. Abdullah
8/29/2025
cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Generative AI (GAI) tools have seen rapid adoption in educational settings, yet their role in fostering critical thinking remains underexplored. While previous studies have examined GAI as a tutor for specific lessons or as a tool for completing assignments, few have addressed how students critically evaluate the accuracy and appropriateness of GAI-generated responses. This pilot study investigates students' ability to apply structured critical thinking when assessing Generative AI outputs in introductory Computational and Data Science courses. Given that GAI tools often produce contextually flawed or factually incorrect answers, we designed learning activities that require students to analyze, critique, and revise AI-generated solutions. Our findings offer initial insights into students' ability to engage critically with GAI content and lay the groundwork for more comprehensive studies in future semesters.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lamberti2025pilot,
  title  = {Pilot Study on Generative AI and Critical Thinking in Higher Education Classrooms},
  author = {W. F. Lamberti and S. R. Lawrence and D. White and S. Kim and S. Abdullah},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.00167},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00167v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.00167.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.00167)

Discussion