Tabular Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations

Wei Zhang, Brian Barr, John Paisley
8/31/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Counterfactual explanations methods provide an important tool in the field of {interpretable machine learning}. Recent advances in this direction have focused on diffusion models to explain a deep classifier. However, these techniques have predominantly focused on problems in computer vision. In this paper, we focus on tabular data typical in finance and the social sciences and propose a novel guided reverse process for categorical features based on an approximation to the Gumbel-softmax distribution. Furthermore, we study the effect of the temperature $τ$ and derive a theoretical bound between the Gumbel-softmax distribution and our proposed approximated distribution. We perform experiments on several large-scale credit lending and other tabular datasets, assessing their performance in terms of the quantitative measures of interpretability, diversity, instability, and validity. These results indicate that our approach outperforms popular baseline methods, producing robust and realistic counterfactual explanations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025tabular,
  title  = {Tabular Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations},
  author = {Wei Zhang and Brian Barr and John Paisley},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.00876},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00876v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.00876.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.00876)

Discussion