Sampling as Bandits: Evaluation-Efficient Design for Black-Box Densities

Takuo Matsubara, Andrew Duncan, Simon Cotter, Konstantinos Zygalakis
9/1/2025
stat.MEcs.LGstat.CO

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce bandit importance sampling (BIS), a new class of importance sampling methods designed for settings where the target density is expensive to evaluate. In contrast to adaptive importance sampling, which optimises a proposal distribution, BIS directly designs the samples through a sequential strategy that combines space-filling designs with multi-armed bandits. Our method leverages Gaussian process surrogates to guide sample selection, enabling efficient exploration of the parameter space with minimal target evaluations. We establish theoretical guarantees on convergence and demonstrate the effectiveness of the method across a broad range of sampling tasks. BIS delivers accurate approximations with fewer target evaluations, outperforming competing approaches across multimodal, heavy-tailed distributions, and real-world applications to Bayesian inference of computationally expensive models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{matsubara2025sampling,
  title  = {Sampling as Bandits: Evaluation-Efficient Design for Black-Box Densities},
  author = {Takuo Matsubara and Andrew Duncan and Simon Cotter and Konstantinos Zygalakis},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.01437},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01437v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.01437.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.01437)

Discussion