Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem

Ryosuke Takata, Atsushi Masumori, Takashi Ikegami
9/4/2025
cs.MAcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate the emergent social dynamics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in a spatially extended El Farol Bar problem, observing how they autonomously navigate this classic social dilemma. As a result, the LLM agents generated a spontaneous motivation to go to the bar and changed their decision making by becoming a collective. We also observed that the LLM agents did not solve the problem completely, but rather behaved more like humans. These findings reveal a complex interplay between external incentives (prompt-specified constraints such as the 60% threshold) and internal incentives (culturally-encoded social preferences derived from pre-training), demonstrating that LLM agents naturally balance formal game-theoretic rationality with social motivations that characterize human behavior. These findings suggest that a new model of group decision making, which could not be handled in the previous game-theoretic problem setting, can be realized by LLM agents.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{takata2025emergent,
  title  = {Emergent Social Dynamics of LLM Agents in the El Farol Bar Problem},
  author = {Ryosuke Takata and Atsushi Masumori and Takashi Ikegami},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.04537},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04537v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.04537.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.04537)

Discussion