Crown, Frame, Reverse: Layer-Wise Scaling Variants for LLM Pre-Training

Andrei Baroian, Kasper Notebomer
9/8/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Transformer-based language models traditionally use uniform (isotropic) layer sizes, yet they ignore the diverse functional roles that different depths can play and their computational capacity needs. Building on Layer-Wise Scaling (LWS) and pruning literature, we introduce three new LWS variants - Framed, Reverse, and Crown - that redistribute FFN widths and attention heads via two or three-point linear interpolation in the pre-training stage. We present the first systematic ablation of LWS and its variants, on a fixed budget of 180M parameters, trained on 5B tokens. All models converge to similar losses and achieve better performance compared to an equal-cost isotropic baseline, without a substantial decrease in training throughput. This work represents an initial step into the design space of layer-wise architectures for pre-training, but future work should scale experiments to orders of magnitude more tokens and parameters to fully assess their potential.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{baroian2025crown,
  title  = {Crown, Frame, Reverse: Layer-Wise Scaling Variants for LLM Pre-Training},
  author = {Andrei Baroian and Kasper Notebomer},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.06518},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06518v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.06518.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.06518)

Discussion