Explaining How Quantization Disparately Skews a Model

Abhimanyu Bellam, Jung-Eun Kim
9/8/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Post Training Quantization (PTQ) is widely adopted due to its high compression capacity and speed with minimal impact on accuracy. However, we observed that disparate impacts are exacerbated by quantization, especially for minority groups. Our analysis explains that in the course of quantization there is a chain of factors attributed to a disparate impact across groups during forward and backward passes. We explore how the changes in weights and activations induced by quantization cause cascaded impacts in the network, resulting in logits with lower variance, increased loss, and compromised group accuracies. We extend our study to verify the influence of these impacts on group gradient norms and eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix, providing insights into the state of the network from an optimization point of view. To mitigate these effects, we propose integrating mixed precision Quantization Aware Training (QAT) with dataset sampling methods and weighted loss functions, therefore providing fair deployment of quantized neural networks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bellam2025explaining,
  title  = {Explaining How Quantization Disparately Skews a Model},
  author = {Abhimanyu Bellam and Jung-Eun Kim},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.07222},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07222v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.07222.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.07222)

Discussion