Multi-Topic Projected Opinion Dynamics for Resource Allocation

Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Martínez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
9/9/2025
eess.SYcs.GTcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We propose a model of opinion formation on resource allocation among multiple topics by multiple agents, who are subject to hard budget constraints. We define a utility function for each agent and then derive a projected dynamical system model of opinion evolution assuming that each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility subject to its constraints. Inter-agent coupling arises from an undirected social network, while inter-topic coupling arises from resource constraints. We show that opinions always converge to the equilibrium set. For special networks with very weak antagonistic relations, the opinions converge to a unique equilibrium point. We further show that the underlying opinion formation game is a potential game. We relate the equilibria of the dynamics and the Nash equilibria of the game and characterize the unique Nash equilibrium for networks with no antagonistic relations. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wankhede2025multitopic,
  title  = {Multi-Topic Projected Opinion Dynamics for Resource Allocation},
  author = {Prashil Wankhede and Nirabhra Mandal and Sonia Martínez and Pavankumar Tallapragada},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.07847},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07847v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.07847.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.07847)

Discussion