SimpleQA Verified: A Reliable Factuality Benchmark to Measure Parametric Knowledge

Lukas Haas, Gal Yona, Giovanni D'Antonio, Sasha Goldshtein, Dipanjan Das
9/9/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce SimpleQA Verified, a 1,000-prompt benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM) short-form factuality based on OpenAI's SimpleQA. It addresses critical limitations in OpenAI's benchmark, including noisy and incorrect labels, topical biases, and question redundancy. SimpleQA Verified was created through a rigorous multi-stage filtering process involving de-duplication, topic balancing, and source reconciliation to produce a more reliable and challenging evaluation set, alongside improvements in the autorater prompt. On this new benchmark, Gemini 2.5 Pro achieves a state-of-the-art F1-score of 55.6, outperforming other frontier models, including GPT-5. This work provides the research community with a higher-fidelity tool to track genuine progress in parametric model factuality and to mitigate hallucinations. The benchmark dataset, evaluation code, and leaderboard are available at: https://www.kaggle.com/benchmarks/deepmind/simpleqa-verified.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{haas2025simpleqa,
  title  = {SimpleQA Verified: A Reliable Factuality Benchmark to Measure Parametric Knowledge},
  author = {Lukas Haas and Gal Yona and Giovanni D'Antonio and Sasha Goldshtein and Dipanjan Das},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.07968},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07968v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.07968.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.07968)

Discussion