Forecasting Generative Amplification

Henning Bahl, Sascha Diefenbacher, Nina Elmer, Tilman Plehn, Jonas Spinner
9/9/2025
hep-phcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Generative networks are perfect tools to enhance the speed and precision of LHC simulations. It is important to understand their statistical precision, especially when generating events beyond the size of the training dataset. We present two complementary methods to estimate the amplification factor without large holdout datasets. Averaging amplification uses Bayesian networks or ensembling to estimate amplification from the precision of integrals over given phase-space volumes. Differential amplification uses hypothesis testing to quantify amplification without any resolution loss. Applied to state-of-the-art event generators, both methods indicate that amplification is possible in specific regions of phase space, but not yet across the entire distribution.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bahl2025forecasting,
  title  = {Forecasting Generative Amplification},
  author = {Henning Bahl and Sascha Diefenbacher and Nina Elmer and Tilman Plehn and Jonas Spinner},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.08048},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08048v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.08048.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.08048)

Discussion