ClaimIQ at CheckThat! 2025: Comparing Prompted and Fine-Tuned Language Models for Verifying Numerical Claims

Anirban Saha Anik, Md Fahimul Kabir Chowdhury, Andrew Wyckoff, Sagnik Ray Choudhury
9/15/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This paper presents our system for Task 3 of the CLEF 2025 CheckThat! Lab, which focuses on verifying numerical and temporal claims using retrieved evidence. We explore two complementary approaches: zero-shot prompting with instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) and supervised fine-tuning using parameter-efficient LoRA. To enhance evidence quality, we investigate several selection strategies, including full-document input and top-k sentence filtering using BM25 and MiniLM. Our best-performing model LLaMA fine-tuned with LoRA achieves strong performance on the English validation set. However, a notable drop in the test set highlights a generalization challenge. These findings underscore the importance of evidence granularity and model adaptation for robust numerical fact verification.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{anik2025claimiq,
  title  = {ClaimIQ at CheckThat! 2025: Comparing Prompted and Fine-Tuned Language Models for Verifying Numerical Claims},
  author = {Anirban Saha Anik and Md Fahimul Kabir Chowdhury and Andrew Wyckoff and Sagnik Ray Choudhury},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.11492},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11492v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.11492.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.11492)

Discussion