On the Correlation between Individual Fairness and Predictive Accuracy in Probabilistic Models

Alessandro Antonucci, Eric Rossetto, Ivan Duvnjak
9/16/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate individual fairness in generative probabilistic classifiers by analysing the robustness of posterior inferences to perturbations in private features. Building on established results in robustness analysis, we hypothesise a correlation between robustness and predictive accuracy, specifically, instances exhibiting greater robustness are more likely to be classified accurately. We empirically assess this hypothesis using a benchmark of fourteen datasets with fairness concerns, employing Bayesian networks as the underlying generative models. To address the computational complexity associated with robustness analysis over multiple private features with Bayesian networks, we reformulate the problem as a most probable explanation task in an auxiliary Markov random field. Our experiments confirm the hypothesis about the correlation, suggesting novel directions to mitigate the traditional trade-off between fairness and accuracy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{antonucci2025correlation,
  title  = {On the Correlation between Individual Fairness and Predictive Accuracy in Probabilistic Models},
  author = {Alessandro Antonucci and Eric Rossetto and Ivan Duvnjak},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.13165},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13165v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.13165.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.13165)

Discussion