Detection and Simulation of Urban Heat Islands Using a Fine-Tuned Geospatial Foundation Model

David Kreismann
9/20/2025
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

As urbanization and climate change progress, urban heat island effects are becoming more frequent and severe. To formulate effective mitigation plans, cities require detailed air temperature data. However, predictive analytics methods based on conventional machine learning models and limited data infrastructure often provide inaccurate predictions, especially in underserved areas. In this context, geospatial foundation models trained on unstructured global data demonstrate strong generalization and require minimal fine-tuning, offering an alternative for predictions where traditional approaches are limited. This study fine-tunes a geospatial foundation model to predict urban land surface temperatures under future climate scenarios and explores its response to land cover changes using simulated vegetation strategies. The fine-tuned model achieved pixel-wise downscaling errors below 1.74 °C and aligned with ground truth patterns, demonstrating an extrapolation capacity up to 3.62 °C.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kreismann2025detection,
  title  = {Detection and Simulation of Urban Heat Islands Using a Fine-Tuned Geospatial Foundation Model},
  author = {David Kreismann},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.16617},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16617v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.16617.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.16617)

Discussion