A Multi-Level Benchmark for Causal Language Understanding in Social Media Discourse

Xiaohan Ding, Kaike Ping, Buse Çarık, Eugenia Rho
9/20/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Understanding causal language in informal discourse is a core yet underexplored challenge in NLP. Existing datasets largely focus on explicit causality in structured text, providing limited support for detecting implicit causal expressions, particularly those found in informal, user-generated social media posts. We introduce CausalTalk, a multi-level dataset of five years of Reddit posts (2020-2024) discussing public health related to the COVID-19 pandemic, among which 10120 posts are annotated across four causal tasks: (1) binary causal classification, (2) explicit vs. implicit causality, (3) cause-effect span extraction, and (4) causal gist generation. Annotations comprise both gold-standard labels created by domain experts and silver-standard labels generated by GPT-4o and verified by human annotators. CausalTalk bridges fine-grained causal detection and gist-based reasoning over informal text. It enables benchmarking across both discriminative and generative models, and provides a rich resource for studying causal reasoning in social media contexts.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ding2025multilevel,
  title  = {A Multi-Level Benchmark for Causal Language Understanding in Social Media Discourse},
  author = {Xiaohan Ding and Kaike Ping and Buse Çarık and Eugenia Rho},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.16722},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16722v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.16722.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.16722)

Discussion