Persistence Spheres: Bi-continuous Representations of Persistence Diagrams

Matteo Pegoraro
9/21/2025
cs.LGmath.AT

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce persistence spheres, a novel functional representation of persistence diagrams. Unlike existing embeddings (such as persistence images, landscapes, or kernel methods), persistence spheres provide a bi-continuous mapping: they are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the 1-Wasserstein distance and admit a continuous inverse on their image. This ensures, in a theoretically optimal way, both stability and geometric fidelity, making persistence spheres the representation that most closely mirrors the Wasserstein geometry of PDs in linear space. We derive explicit formulas for persistence spheres, showing that they can be computed efficiently and parallelized with minimal overhead. Empirically, we evaluate them on diverse regression and classification tasks involving functional data, time series, graphs, meshes, and point clouds. Across these benchmarks, persistence spheres consistently deliver state-of-the-art or competitive performance compared to persistence images, persistence landscapes, and the sliced Wasserstein kernel.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pegoraro2025persistence,
  title  = {Persistence Spheres: Bi-continuous Representations of Persistence Diagrams},
  author = {Matteo Pegoraro},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.16999},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16999v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.16999.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.16999)

Discussion