Lipschitz-Based Robustness Certification for Recurrent Neural Networks via Convex Relaxation

Paul Hamelbeck, Johannes Schiffer
9/22/2025
eess.SYcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Robustness certification against bounded input noise or adversarial perturbations is increasingly important for deployment recurrent neural networks (RNNs) in safety-critical control applications. To address this challenge, we present RNN-SDP, a relaxation based method that models the RNN's layer interactions as a convex problem and computes a certified upper bound on the Lipschitz constant via semidefinite programming (SDP). We also explore an extension that incorporates known input constraints to further tighten the resulting Lipschitz bounds. RNN-SDP is evaluated on a synthetic multi-tank system, with upper bounds compared to empirical estimates. While incorporating input constraints yields only modest improvements, the general method produces reasonably tight and certifiable bounds, even as sequence length increases. The results also underscore the often underestimated impact of initialization errors, an important consideration for applications where models are frequently re-initialized, such as model predictive control (MPC).

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hamelbeck2025lipschitzbased,
  title  = {Lipschitz-Based Robustness Certification for Recurrent Neural Networks via Convex Relaxation},
  author = {Paul Hamelbeck and Johannes Schiffer},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.17898},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17898v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.17898.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.17898)

Discussion