Do Modern Video-LLMs Need to Listen? A Benchmark Audit and Scalable Remedy

Geewook Kim, Minjoon Seo
9/22/2025
cs.CVcs.MMcs.SD

Official code: naver-ai/LLaVA-AV-SSM (4 stars, last commit 2025-11-24).

Abstract

Speech and audio encoders developed over years of community effort are routinely excluded from video understanding pipelines -- not because they fail, but because benchmarks never required listening. We audit 10 video benchmarks and find items largely solvable from visual cues alone: a single-frame probe answers ~77% of AVQA without audio, suggesting poor measurement of audio-visual reasoning. Building on LLaVA-OneVision, we attach a speech/audio encoder and compare five compressor architectures under 25x token reduction (25 Hz to 1 Hz). Across 10 benchmarks -- with and without filtering -- audio yields clear gains on tasks requiring speech comprehension or cross-modal grounding, while vision-centric suites remain largely unaffected. Our results show that speech encoders play a larger role in video understanding than current benchmarks suggest. We will fully open-source our work at https://github.com/naver-ai/LLaVA-AV-SSM.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Official repository of the paper "Does audio matter for modern video-LLMs and their benchmarks?"

40Sep 18, 202511 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kim2025modern,
  title  = {Do Modern Video-LLMs Need to Listen? A Benchmark Audit and Scalable Remedy},
  author = {Geewook Kim and Minjoon Seo},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.17901},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17901v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.17901.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.17901)

Discussion