Radiology's Last Exam (RadLE): Benchmarking Frontier Multimodal AI Against Human Experts and a Taxonomy of Visual Reasoning Errors in Radiology

Suvrankar Datta, Divya Buchireddygari, Lakshmi Vennela Chowdary Kaza, Mrudula Bhalke, Kautik Singh +22 more
9/29/2025
cs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Generalist multimodal AI systems such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly accessed by clinicians and patients alike for medical image interpretation through widely available consumer-facing chatbots. Most evaluations claiming expert level performance are on public datasets containing common pathologies. Rigorous evaluation of frontier models on difficult diagnostic cases remains limited. We developed a pilot benchmark of 50 expert-level "spot diagnosis" cases across multiple imaging modalities to evaluate the performance of frontier AI models against board-certified radiologists and radiology trainees. To mirror real-world usage, the reasoning modes of five popular frontier AI models were tested through their native web interfaces, viz. OpenAI o3, OpenAI GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok-4, and Claude Opus 4.1. Accuracy was scored by blinded experts, and reproducibility was assessed across three independent runs. GPT-5 was additionally evaluated across various reasoning modes. Reasoning quality errors were assessed and a taxonomy of visual reasoning errors was defined. Board-certified radiologists achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (83%), outperforming trainees (45%) and all AI models (best performance shown by GPT-5: 30%). Reliability was substantial for GPT-5 and o3, moderate for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok-4, and poor for Claude Opus 4.1. These findings demonstrate that advanced frontier models fall far short of radiologists in challenging diagnostic cases. Our benchmark highlights the present limitations of generalist AI in medical imaging and cautions against unsupervised clinical use. We also provide a qualitative analysis of reasoning traces and propose a practical taxonomy of visual reasoning errors by AI models for better understanding their failure modes, informing evaluation standards and guiding more robust model development.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{datta2025radiologys,
  title  = {Radiology's Last Exam (RadLE): Benchmarking Frontier Multimodal AI Against Human Experts and a Taxonomy of Visual Reasoning Errors in Radiology},
  author = {Suvrankar Datta and Divya Buchireddygari and Lakshmi Vennela Chowdary Kaza and Mrudula Bhalke and Kautik Singh and Ayush Pandey and Sonit Sai Vasipalli and Upasana Karnwal and Hakikat Bir Singh Bhatti and Bhavya Ratan Maroo and Sanjana Hebbar and Rahul Joseph and Gurkawal Kaur and Devyani Singh and Akhil V and Dheeksha Devasya Shama Prasad and Nishtha Mahajan and Ayinaparthi Arisha and Rajesh Vanagundi and Reet Nandy and Kartik Vuthoo and Snigdhaa Rajvanshi and Nikhileswar Kondaveeti and Suyash Gunjal and Rishabh Jain and Rajat Jain and Anurag Agrawal},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.25559},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25559v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.25559.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.25559)

Discussion