CliniBench: A Clinical Outcome Prediction Benchmark for Generative and Encoder-Based Language Models

Paul Grundmann, Dennis Fast, Jan Frick, Thomas Steffek, Felix Gers +2 more
9/30/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

With their growing capabilities, generative large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly investigated for complex medical tasks. However, their effectiveness in real-world clinical applications remains underexplored. To address this, we present CliniBench, the first benchmark that enables comparability of well-studied encoder-based classifiers and generative LLMs for discharge diagnosis prediction from admission notes in MIMIC-IV dataset. Our extensive study compares 12 generative LLMs and 3 encoder-based classifiers and demonstrates that encoder-based classifiers consistently outperform generative models in diagnosis prediction. We assess several retrieval augmentation strategies for in-context learning from similar patients and find that they provide notable performance improvements for generative LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{grundmann2025clinibench,
  title  = {CliniBench: A Clinical Outcome Prediction Benchmark for Generative and Encoder-Based Language Models},
  author = {Paul Grundmann and Dennis Fast and Jan Frick and Thomas Steffek and Felix Gers and Wolfgang Nejdl and Alexander Löser},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.26136},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26136v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.26136.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.26136)

Discussion