Are Robust LLM Fingerprints Adversarially Robust?

Anshul Nasery, Edoardo Contente, Alkin Kaz, Pramod Viswanath, Sewoong Oh
9/30/2025
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Model fingerprinting has emerged as a promising paradigm for claiming model ownership. However, robustness evaluations of these schemes have mostly focused on benign perturbations such as incremental fine-tuning, model merging, and prompting. Lack of systematic investigations into {\em adversarial robustness} against a malicious model host leaves current systems vulnerable. To bridge this gap, we first define a concrete, practical threat model against model fingerprinting. We then take a critical look at existing model fingerprinting schemes to identify their fundamental vulnerabilities. Based on these, we develop adaptive adversarial attacks tailored for each vulnerability, and demonstrate that these can bypass model authentication completely for ten recently proposed fingerprinting schemes while maintaining high utility of the model for the end users. Our work encourages fingerprint designers to adopt adversarial robustness by design. We end with recommendations for future fingerprinting methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nasery2025robust,
  title  = {Are Robust LLM Fingerprints Adversarially Robust?},
  author = {Anshul Nasery and Edoardo Contente and Alkin Kaz and Pramod Viswanath and Sewoong Oh},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2509.26598},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26598v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2509.26598.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2509.26598)

Discussion