Why mask diffusion does not work

Haocheng Sun, Cynthia Xin Wen, Edward Hong Wang
9/29/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The main advantages of diffusion language models over autoregressive (AR) models lie in their ability to support parallel generation and bidirectional attention, enabling a more controllable generation process. In recent years, open-source mask diffusion language models have emerged, most of which are based on a variant known as absorbing diffusion. However, this paper demonstrates why mask diffusion faces inherent difficulties in achieving parallel generation and bidirectional attention. We also propose the most effective training and inference strategies for mask diffusion.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sun2025mask,
  title  = {Why mask diffusion does not work},
  author = {Haocheng Sun and Cynthia Xin Wen and Edward Hong Wang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.03289},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03289v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.03289.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.03289)

Discussion