SEER: The Span-based Emotion Evidence Retrieval Benchmark

Aneesha Sampath, Oya Aran, Emily Mower Provost
10/3/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: chailab-umich/SEER (0 stars, last commit 2026-03-27).

Abstract

We introduce the SEER (Span-based Emotion Evidence Retrieval) Benchmark to test Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to identify the specific spans of text that express emotion. Unlike traditional emotion recognition tasks that assign a single label to an entire sentence, SEER targets the underexplored task of emotion evidence detection: pinpointing which exact phrases convey emotion. This span-level approach is crucial for applications like empathetic dialogue and clinical support, which need to know how emotion is expressed, not just what the emotion is. SEER includes two tasks: identifying emotion evidence within a single sentence, and identifying evidence across a short passage of five consecutive sentences. It contains new annotations for both emotion and emotion evidence on 1200 real-world sentences. We evaluate 14 open-source LLMs and find that, while some models approach average human performance on single-sentence inputs, their accuracy degrades in longer passages. Our error analysis reveals key failure modes, including overreliance on emotion keywords and false positives in neutral text.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

chailab-umich/SEERCommunity70%

SEER: The Span-based Emotion Evidence Retrieval Benchmark

00PythonOct 3, 20256 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sampath2025seer,
  title  = {SEER: The Span-based Emotion Evidence Retrieval Benchmark},
  author = {Aneesha Sampath and Oya Aran and Emily Mower Provost},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.03490},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03490v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.03490.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.03490)

Discussion