Computing frustration and near-monotonicity in deep neural networks

Joel Wendin, Erik G. Larsson, Claudio Altafini
10/6/2025
cs.LGcond-mat.dis-nnstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

For the signed graph associated to a deep neural network, one can compute the frustration level, i.e., test how close or distant the graph is to structural balance. For all the pretrained deep convolutional neural networks we consider, we find that the frustration is always less than expected from null models. From a statistical physics point of view, and in particular in reference to an Ising spin glass model, the reduced frustration indicates that the amount of disorder encoded in the network is less than in the null models. From a functional point of view, low frustration (i.e., proximity to structural balance) means that the function representing the network behaves near-monotonically, i.e., more similarly to a monotone function than in the null models. Evidence of near-monotonic behavior along the partial order determined by frustration is observed for all networks we consider. This confirms that the class of deep convolutional neural networks tends to have a more ordered behavior than expected from null models, and suggests a novel form of implicit regularization.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wendin2025computing,
  title  = {Computing frustration and near-monotonicity in deep neural networks},
  author = {Joel Wendin and Erik G. Larsson and Claudio Altafini},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.05286},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05286v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.05286.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.05286)

Discussion