Spectral Prefiltering of Neural Fields

Mustafa B. Yaldiz, Ishit Mehta, Nithin Raghavan, Andreas Meuleman, Tzu-Mao Li +1 more
10/9/2025
cs.GRcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Neural fields excel at representing continuous visual signals but typically operate at a single, fixed resolution. We present a simple yet powerful method to optimize neural fields that can be prefiltered in a single forward pass. Key innovations and features include: (1) We perform convolutional filtering in the input domain by analytically scaling Fourier feature embeddings with the filter's frequency response. (2) This closed-form modulation generalizes beyond Gaussian filtering and supports other parametric filters (Box and Lanczos) that are unseen at training time. (3) We train the neural field using single-sample Monte Carlo estimates of the filtered signal. Our method is fast during both training and inference, and imposes no additional constraints on the network architecture. We show quantitative and qualitative improvements over existing methods for neural-field filtering.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yaldiz2025spectral,
  title  = {Spectral Prefiltering of Neural Fields},
  author = {Mustafa B. Yaldiz and Ishit Mehta and Nithin Raghavan and Andreas Meuleman and Tzu-Mao Li and Ravi Ramamoorthi},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.08394},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08394v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.08394.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.08394)

Discussion