Nonlinear discretizations and Newton's method: characterizing stationary points of regression objectives

Conor Rowan
10/13/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Second-order methods are emerging as promising alternatives to standard first-order optimizers such as gradient descent and ADAM for training neural networks. Though the advantages of including curvature information in computing optimization steps have been celebrated in the scientific machine learning literature, the only second-order methods that have been studied are quasi-Newton, meaning that the Hessian matrix of the objective function is approximated. Though one would expect only to gain from using the true Hessian in place of its approximation, we show that neural network training reliably fails when relying on exact curvature information. The failure modes provide insight both into the geometry of nonlinear discretizations as well as the distribution of stationary points in the loss landscape, leading us to question the conventional wisdom that the loss landscape is replete with local minima.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rowan2025nonlinear,
  title  = {Nonlinear discretizations and Newton's method: characterizing stationary points of regression objectives},
  author = {Conor Rowan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.11987},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11987v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.11987.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.11987)

Discussion