Research in Collaborative Learning Does Not Serve Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Practice

Kevin Kuo, Chhavi Yadav, Virginia Smith
10/14/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Cross-silo federated learning (FL) is a promising approach to enable cross-organization collaboration in machine learning model development without directly sharing private data. Despite growing organizational interest driven by data protection regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA, the adoption of cross-silo FL remains limited in practice. In this paper, we conduct an interview study to understand the practical challenges associated with cross-silo FL adoption. With interviews spanning a diverse set of stakeholders such as user organizations, software providers, and academic researchers, we uncover various barriers, from concerns about model performance to questions of incentives and trust between participating organizations. Our study shows that cross-silo FL faces a set of challenges that have yet to be well-captured by existing research in the area and are quite distinct from other forms of federated learning such as cross-device FL. We end with a discussion on future research directions that can help overcome these challenges.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kuo2025research,
  title  = {Research in Collaborative Learning Does Not Serve Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Practice},
  author = {Kevin Kuo and Chhavi Yadav and Virginia Smith},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.12595},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12595v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.12595.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.12595)

Discussion