Semantic Relation-Enhanced CLIP Adapter for Domain Adaptive Zero-Shot Learning

Jiaao Yu, Mingjie Han, Jinkun Jiang, Junyu Dong, Tao Gong +1 more
10/21/2025
cs.CVcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: yjainqdc/SRECLIP (0 stars, last commit 2025-09-16).

Abstract

The high cost of data annotation has spurred research on training deep learning models in data-limited scenarios. Existing paradigms, however, fail to balance cross-domain transfer and cross-category generalization, giving rise to the demand for Domain-Adaptive Zero-Shot Learning (DAZSL). Although vision-language models (e.g., CLIP) have inherent advantages in the DAZSL field, current studies do not fully exploit their potential. Applying CLIP to DAZSL faces two core challenges: inefficient cross-category knowledge transfer due to the lack of semantic relation guidance, and degraded cross-modal alignment during target domain fine-tuning. To address these issues, we propose a Semantic Relation-Enhanced CLIP (SRE-CLIP) Adapter framework, integrating a Semantic Relation Structure Loss and a Cross-Modal Alignment Retention Strategy. As the first CLIP-based DAZSL method, SRE-CLIP achieves state-of-the-art performance on the I2AwA and I2WebV benchmarks, significantly outperforming existing approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

yjainqdc/SRECLIPCommunity64%

SEMANTIC RELATION-ENHANCED CLIP ADAPTER FOR DOMAIN ADAPTIVE ZERO-SHOT LEARNING

00PythonSep 5, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yu2025semantic,
  title  = {Semantic Relation-Enhanced CLIP Adapter for Domain Adaptive Zero-Shot Learning},
  author = {Jiaao Yu and Mingjie Han and Jinkun Jiang and Junyu Dong and Tao Gong and Man Lan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.21808},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21808v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.21808.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.21808)

Discussion