MUStReason: A Benchmark for Diagnosing Pragmatic Reasoning in Video-LMs for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection

Anisha Saha, Varsha Suresh, Timothy Hospedales, Vera Demberg
10/27/2025
cs.LGcs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: anisha0325/MUStReason (2 stars, last commit 2026-04-09).

Abstract

Sarcasm is a specific type of irony which involves discerning what is said from what is meant. Detecting sarcasm depends not only on the literal content of an utterance but also on non-verbal cues such as speaker's tonality, facial expressions and conversational context. However, current multimodal models struggle with complex tasks like sarcasm detection, which require identifying relevant cues across modalities and pragmatically reasoning over them to infer the speaker's intention. To explore these limitations in VideoLMs, we introduce MUStReason, a diagnostic benchmark enriched with annotations of modality-specific relevant cues and underlying reasoning steps to identify sarcastic intent. In addition to benchmarking sarcasm classification performance in VideoLMs, using MUStReason we quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the generated reasoning by disentangling the problem into perception and reasoning, we propose PragCoT, a framework that steers VideoLMs to focus on implied intentions over literal meaning, a property core to detecting sarcasm.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

[LREC 2026] MUStReason: A Benchmark for Diagnosing Pragmatic Reasoning in Video-LMs for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection

20Feb 15, 20266 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{saha2025mustreason,
  title  = {MUStReason: A Benchmark for Diagnosing Pragmatic Reasoning in Video-LMs for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection},
  author = {Anisha Saha and Varsha Suresh and Timothy Hospedales and Vera Demberg},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.23727},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23727v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.23727.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.23727)

Discussion